Total waste of time.
Total waste of time.
I complained about 02 who were refusing to release my 80-year-old mother from her contract. She had moved shortly after renewing her contract but found her new flat did not have the coverage promised at the point of sale or on the coverage checker. As she was just outside the cooling off period 02 would not release her without a significant financial penalty.
After months, the ombudsman simple found in 02's favour saying, effectively, 'rules are rules'.
I pointed out that this was about being flexible with the rules given the specific circumstances, but the Ombudsman simply replied 'if they bend the rules for you they would have to bend them for everybody.
So, it's OK - according to the Ombudsman - for an 80-year-old woman to be forced either to sit shivering in the garden to use her 'phone, or be forced to buy unwanted broadband and VoIP because the service she thought she was getting doesn't work at the home address.
Don't bother with the Ombudsman - they serve no purpose for consumers.
Addendum:
The response below just serves to illustrate that the Ombudsman is either toothless, pointless, or biased towards the mobile companies who fund them. You decide.
'... providers who pay us a fee for each dispute we have to review, regardless of the resolution. '
From the Ombudsman's parent company's website (Trust Alliance Group Ltd).
September 25, 2024
Unprompted review