£100 for a £70 tree, not good value.
You spend £100 on a tree that has a wonderful description but you don’t know what you’re actually getting until it arrives, so it’s pot luck. You wouldn’t do that with spending this sort of money on anything else, would you?
I got a nice tree but a lot smaller than expected, Apical stem had been cut, which restricts growth (height). I wanted a tall tree for shade which is exactly why I ordered a tall one, as per description!
I paid over £100 for a £70 tree, sent by a third party.
I was going to bulk buy hedging plants but they’re even more ridiculously priced! Local company here does them for half the price.
Not the best company and not the best customer service. I’d buy somewhere else next time.
In response to the customer service comedian, I got a 12l container 1.7m high (incl pot) tree priced at £72 on Matthews website, sent directly from Matthews but I paid £104 for it. I paid for a taller tree because that’s what I wanted. It’s priced at £70 in the garden centres and garden centres aren’t usually cheap.
Website should state it’s a Matthews 12litre tree (not 1.8m - 2.2m) but the customer pays £104 through trees-online instead of £72. What a joke.
Oh and cutting the apical stem stimulates lateral growth making it more bushy, not taller. I went for the tallest tree because I wanted tall one.
October 30, 2024
Unprompted review