If your looking to have a bet its not…
If your looking to have a bet its not the worse site, the odds on footy games especially if you do a bet builder like me aren't has good has other sites, withdrawing money takes a little longer, but I like a go on the slots and this sites up their with william hill has the worse, most sites you'll get on average 90-97% back on every pound you stake, so you get a bit of a run for your money before losing it, this site its more like 20- 30% if that, even if you're lucky enough to hit a feature on one of there games you'll be lucky to get much more than your stake back on it, slot players will know what I mean, I had 4 consecutive features on one game and didn't win a single penny on each, like I said I do the occasional bet builder and checked the odds on my selection with another site I use, using the same selections the other site offered 50% more, stay away if you want value
Reply from Quickbet
Thank you for the detailed review, Michael!
I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts, and I'm glad you don't think we're the worst site for sports bets. But I do want to address a few things.
The game you played the most, Seamen by Nolimit City, is a high-volatility slot. Dry spells are completely normal.
The game has a hit frequency of 20.20%, Free Spins: 1 in 263 and a Max Win probability of 1 in 41 million.
The sessions you had are not that shocking to be honest.
You also mentioned "their games", but just to clarify, none of the games are ours. They're provided by third-party studios who deliver the exact same games across majority of the industry. We have no control over the outcome whatsoever.
As for the sportsbook, we always aim to stay as competitive as possible, but odds can vary slightly between operators depending on the market, but I will pass on your feedback!
At the end of the day, luck is the only factor in play, and it doesn't always cooperate sadly.
Kind regards, Ebba!