Magistrate ruling overturned in Crown Court
I am incredibly grateful to Mr. Sunil Rupasinha and Kent Traffic Law for their exceptional service. I was facing a serious injustice after being wrongly convicted of a mobile phone offense in the magistrate court.
The officer's account was inconsistent, and the bodycam footage actually supported my claim of using hands-free earbuds. Despite this, I was unfairly penalized with 6 points and a £1600 fine.After seeing the many positive reviews from other clients, I decided to instruct Mr. Rupasinha directly. This was the best decision I could have made. He expertly handled my appeal in the crown court, and I am so relieved that he successfully overturned the original, unjust ruling.Mr. Rupasinha's expertise and dedication were evident throughout the process. I highly recommend Kent Traffic Law to anyone facing unfair traffic charges. Their professionalism and effectiveness are truly outstanding.
Reply from KentTrafficLaw
It is not uncommon for motorists to represent themselves in the Magistrates’ Court after seeking informal advice or conducting their own research. However, the experience can often prove disheartening when their evidence is rejected particularly in cases where the testimony of a police officer is preferred. Experience has taught me how difficult it can be to succeed in such circumstances.
Following your conviction, you sought my advice to assess the legal and evidential merits of your case. We met in conference, where we examined the material in detail. Although your appeal faced considerable challenges — particularly given the reliance upon eyewitness evidence from a police officer — you resolved to proceed.
At the Crown Court hearing, despite the prosecution being represented by a barrister, the appeal succeeded and your clean driving licence has been restored to you. I commend your determination in pursuing the matter and, while the process inevitably involved expense, your judgement was fully vindicated. Thank you for your kind and considered review.