Sleek, confident, but structurally empty — all the risk is yours
I’ve taken time to analyze this project deeply, including direct communication with the founder. The website looks great. The messaging is confident. But behind the style? The structure is worryingly hollow.
They claim to be active since 2012 — yet the domain was only registered in August 2013.
They claim full operations since 2018 — but the company was incorporated in 2022 as a UK LLP, a structure that offers no financial licensing or user protection.
And after 3 more years of product development and marketing, they still say:
“We’re just getting started.”
“We’re working on it.”
🚨 Red Flags:
• The company is not regulated by any financial authority.
• There’s no Proof of Reserves, no insurance, no third-party audits.
• Users sign nothing — they just transfer funds without any formal financial contract.
• The only public face is “Eugene Netso” — a pseudonym. His real name (Evgenii Kuznetsov) is disclosed only in backend legal filings and private replies.
• Two other company members are listed in the UK LLP register, but they are also Russian nationals and completely absent from the public-facing site.
The entire operation hides behind branding and storytelling — not behind financial frameworks or clear governance.
Having observed platforms like MindCapital (Gonzalo García-Pelayo), CashFX (Oscar Lopez), QubitTech/QubitLife (Greg Limon), and Om Mantra (Julien Chatti), I’ve learned that charisma is not compliance.
They all had bold narratives — and they all disappeared with user funds.
EarnPark currently offers no verifiable foundation that would justify trust.
No matter the design, the “DeFi roadmap,” or the token promises, all the risk is transferred to the user — and none of the accountability remains with them.
❗ Don’t confuse polish with protection.
❗ Don’t confuse words with warranties.
❗ Don’t be the liquidity of someone else’s experiment.
Reply from EarnPark