Not at all what one would expect from the legal profession
AK’S responses to criticisms posted here are at least consistent – their service standards are exemplary and any customer that feels otherwise is patently mistaken and only has themselves to blame. Their reaction to what I have to say here is therefore extremely predictable. I have genuinely been astonished at the attitude their anonymous, so-called “Legal Team” have taken, particularly coming from such an estimable profession. It strikes me that it is one of these organisations that insist you play by their rules and take great exception if you do not. If you do, the service would appear to be good, but God-forbid if you don’t.
Looking back, there were some ominous early warning signs when it appeared that any contact outside of what they deemed as absolutely necessary was chargeable over and above the quoted price, but at that stage I was too far down the road to do anything other than battle on.
The issue now is their unilateral decision to introduce a subscription-based club as the only means of gaining access to one’s documents, without providing a cost-free opt-out and I am not surprised to see that there are others who have found their approach and tactics unacceptable, bordering on exploitative. New customers presumably are told about these new costs and have the option to go elsewhere if they wish, but of course existing customers do not. One might reasonably regard this as sharp-practice, but AK does not like this expression so let’s just describe it as opportunistic. In my experience & by my standards, they have shown a lack of integrity, which of course they dispute.
I believe that the introduction of these new charges in this manner is outside the deal I had with them and simply wish to take my documents back & end the relationship. I am prepared to pay a postage cost or collect them personally, but not pay an additional, large “exit fee”, never previously mentioned. However, in expressing my displeasure at effectively being blackmailed, but nevertheless trying to reach a quick resolution, I have been met with some surprising accusations:
1) I am “unprofessional”, despite not claiming to be a professional. There is a certain irony here.
2) I am guilty of harassment – I’m not sure who I have harassed as all of the correspondence is anonymous – always a cause for suspicion. All I want is my documents back when it appears they are being held hostage.
As it currently stands, I have been given a “final warning” (no idea what that means) and they are refusing to deal with me any longer, only my legal representatives. They have denied me the opportunity to represent myself, a right afforded in both courts and tribunals. All their correspondence is labelled “not for publication or dissemination” – so clearly they don’t want anyone else to see their intimidation and threats. It is plain that the nameless staff in the “Legal Team” have very little legal training and even less in the art of customer service.
I suspect the staff that respond to the criticisms here are the same staff that caused them, so again, they are just a tad biased. We’ll no doubt see. It will also interesting to see the nature of their complaints process (probably handled by the same team) and which regulatory bodies are involved.
Would I recommend to my friends and family? No, one can only speak as one finds.
Update: Worth noting that AK’s response does not contest any of the issues I have raised. Persistence is sadly necessary to counter the prevarication (remembering the documents are rightfully mine) which has been frustrating, but no fair-minded person would apply any more extreme interpretation, of that I am sure.
They will of course exploit the leverage that they think holding original documents gives them. So I’ll update further when they address the outstanding issues. Readers here can judge for themselves which version of events they wish to believe.
In terms of their “business model” mentioned elsewhere in this thread, it rather sounds like the legal advisors we meet are actually self-employed, which allows AK to sidestep any culpability for incorrect legal advice. However, if the dispute is to do with the company’s commercial practices, there is no independent recourse – you can complain to them and you can appeal their decision, but only to them. Beyond that, there is nowhere to go.
Further Update: One month on and there is stalemate. AKL refuses to return my documents & has taken the highly unprofessional decision not to even attempt to find a solution. Given they cannot dispose of the documents, I have no idea what leverage they think they have & what they think the end-point will be. Ho hum. My advice to others would be to use a traditional solicitor, even if it costs a wee bit more.
September 30, 2022
Unprompted review