First of all, I'm not a user of this or other faucet collection bots on ethical and moral grounds, not to speak of other more obvious concerns. To make a reasoned stance on this particular bot, and to make a general judgment about using such bots, which may appear attractive to many like me on the surface, I've asked the following question to one of the most prominent AIs and received a stunning response as follows:

Question (prompt):

What can you say about the xobit(dot)in website if it's a scam or a legit business, accepted by faucet owners? I generally wonder if harvesting or milking crypto faucets by such faucet bots is an acceptable or unfair practice for faucet providers. Please make it an in-depth analysis from the point of view of moral values.

AI response:

In-Depth Analysis of Xobit and Faucet Bot Use: Morality and Legitimacy

Here's a breakdown of the xobit website, faucet bots, and their moral implications:

Xobit

Legitimacy: There's limited information available to definitively say whether Xobit.in is a scam or a legitimate business. Here's what raises concerns:
Lack of transparency: Little public information exists about the company's ownership, registration, or business practices.
Earning Potential: Extraordinarily high earning claims can be a red flag for unrealistic promises.
Potential Issues:
Data Collection: The site might collect user data for unknown purposes.
Security Risks: Unreliable websites could expose users to malware or phishing scams.
Faucet Bots and Morality:

Arguments Against:
Unfair Advantage: Bots can unfairly claim rewards faster than manual users, potentially exceeding intended distribution limits. This could hurt the sustainability of faucets.
Effort vs. Reward: The intended purpose of faucets is often to reward users for engaging with advertisements or completing tasks. Bots bypass this effort, potentially undermining the system.
Resource Drain: Bots can overload faucet servers with automated requests, increasing costs and potentially slowing down legitimate users.
Arguments For:
Accessibility: Bots could be helpful for users with disabilities or limited internet access.
Efficiency: For users with a large number of faucets, bots can save time.
Freedom of Choice: Some argue users should be free to use any tools they choose.

Moral Considerations:

Respecting Rules: Using bots violates the terms of service of many faucets, which is ethically questionable.
Intention of the System: The intended purpose of faucets is often user engagement. Bots undermine this by automating the process.
Sustainability: Excessive bot use could lead to the closure of faucets, hurting everyone involved.
Finding Balance:

Faucet use is generally considered a grey area. Here are some things to consider:

Respect the Terms of Service: If a faucet explicitly prohibits bots, using one is unethical.
Consider Fairness: If bots give you an unfair advantage, consider if it's worth undermining the system for everyone.
Alternatives: Many faucets offer legitimate ways to earn more rewards, like loyalty bonuses or referrals.
Conclusion:

Xobit.in raises red flags due to its lack of transparency. Using bots on faucets can be morally questionable depending on the situation. It's important to consider the spirit of the system and strive for a balance between efficiency and fairness.

Additional Tips:

Look for reputable faucet providers with clear terms of service.
Explore alternative ways to earn crypto, like learning about blockchain technology or participating in crypto games.
Consider the environmental impact of crypto mining before getting involved.
Remember, the best approach may depend on your specific values and priorities.

So how do you like it? I believe that this text should be displayed on the Trustpilot website in a visible area as a precaution to anyone trying to get things achieved at a minimum pain and great risk, but often falling prey to scammers and getting drawn into dealing with morally and ethically shady business.