Outright unfactual statements combined with some Dr. Strange level mind bending senseless logic and goalpost shifting. In CPU reviews, they do not even discuss the CPU anymore. They straight up talk a... See more
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews.
Review summary
Based on reviews, created with AI
Based on these reviews
Company details
Information provided by various external sources
Top Market Research & Genuine Product Insight from our Users. Quickly find category leading products with UserBenchmark.
Contact info
Do not use
Intel shills. They specifically do not publish multi-thread CPU results because intel would get crushed, instead they only have arbitrary tests like "4 threads" or "8 threads" and highly misleading aggregated results.
False information.
I dont even know what to say, but there's probably not a single component site out there that spreads false information as much as userbench does.
Last site you should EVER USE.
This website is too BIASED to be considered legit.
This website seems good at first. There are comparisons of GPUs with percentages to quantify the differences. Then, as you read the reviews written by GPUPro, you can see his or her extreme bias.
I have used both AMD and Nvidia products over the years and currently have both brands in different computers that I use for gaming. Both are great, but with AMD it feels like I got the better value (7900XT for $730 a few years back). All the youtubers and reddit posts confirm my beliefs and have the data to back it up.
All GPUPro does is trash AMD and praise Nvidia, regardless of product quality or performance.
Steer clear if you can.
UserBenchmark has become notorious for…
UserBenchmark has become notorious for its bias, particularly favoring Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs while unfairly downplaying AMD hardware. Its so-called “reviews” often twist facts, cherry-pick benchmarks, and dismiss real-world performance data that contradict their narrative. For example, they claim AMD’s X3D CPUs are overpriced and underperforming, despite widespread independent testing showing them as top-tier gaming chips. Instead of presenting fair, balanced data, UserBenchmark reads more like an Intel/Nvidia marketing piece than a trustworthy benchmark tool. Gamers and PC builders should ignore it entirely and rely on reputable reviewers and testing outlets that actually measure real-world performance without spin.
Outright unfactual statements combined…
Outright unfactual statements combined with some Dr. Strange level mind bending senseless logic and goalpost shifting. In CPU reviews, they do not even discuss the CPU anymore. They straight up talk about GPUs and then suddenly how they are not the most important thing for gaming and then they jump to marketing, and top it off with some random scribble about the company's stock performance....the list goes on. The problem is that they top the Google search queries which can actually infect an honest customer's purchase using their hard earned money. It is sad really how many people end up wasting money based on their "reviews".
It regularly appears in Google results…But the bias is tough to get through
It regularly appears in Google results and their comparison data seems accurate and informative but the frankly embarrassing publication bias against AMD makes it hard to believe there's any validity to their information.
Userbenchmark is run by zealots
Userbenchmark seems to fan-boy over Intel. To the extent they assert outlandish things, like AMD has masterfully manipulated all tech media to say AMD processors are more performant than Intel's even though they're not. This, of course, makes no sense. Intel is a far larger company with far more resources to throw at things like this. If either company could do something like that (they can't), it's more likely Intel would be the one that could pull it off.
This is one example of many of the deranged behavior demonstrated by the people running Userbenchmark.
Unfortunately, Userbenchmark ranks fairly well in SEO. A lot of unsuspecting people will use Userbenchmark to make decisions about what hardware to purchase and they are being completely mislead. I was one such person. Do not trust what they say!
For some reason they just hate AMD
For some reason they just hate AMD. Incredibly biased especially when it comes to CPUs
How the mighty have fallen
Used to use this side but their bias is clear as a day and the edgy FAQ is just ridiculous.
It says free
It says free. However, when you try to test (Your PC) you get "Server is full, buy Pro", ...sorry...but... what server you are talking about?...... you are using my computer to run the test, my computer will then send the result after the test to the server, why lying, just make it premium and stop the bullshit.
Whiny losers
Honestly. Just whiny losers who refute their own results in their childish review texts complaining about some sort of conspiracy that wants to push AMD GPUs which according to them is the worst thing ever. It is so laughable. It's a GPU ffs. You have hard facts aka data and there is no conspiracy. The cards are fine and people who don't know better read this crap and might actually believe it. They're just really really stupid.
I cannot believe I used to use this site
I cannot believe I used to use this site, they manipulate the score weights in order to make NVIDIA and Intel look much better than they actually are. They have now even included text on every page blaming Reddit and Trustpilot reviewers and calling them marketers just because they are being called out. Terrible, avoid at all costs and listen to reputable tech reviewers instead!
Biased content
Biased content in favor of invidia and intel. They claim "cherry picked benches for amd cards" when I have used my full amd system and blown past their "real world performance" claims. They are either getting paid by Intel and Invidia or they just absolutely hate amd.
Believe it or not this website used to…
Believe it or not this website used to be semi-decent for comparisons up until AMD came back with Ryzen in 2017. Then it just became an obsessed anti-AMD BS propaganda machine.
The joke it has become today is just pathetic. The guy behind it should just retire and stop embarrassing himself further.
It looked useful..
It looked useful... That is until you start reading the extremely biased posts on the site, which makes it feel you can't trust a word said there.
Childish Editor Claims Numbers Don't Mean Everything
Userbenchmark is essentially just a smear campaign for anyone that isnt Intel or NVIDIA. It has been an unreasonably long time since the editor who provides component reviews has posted anything worthwhile in terms of actual comparison, all scrutiny on this website is simply made on the basis that the editor is correct always and does not like AMD. Even when benchmarks on the website from AMD GPUs/CPUs outperform a similarly-priced competitor, the editor provides completely fabricated and falsified analogous claims to try and defend his preferred company. The editor even goes as far to call all negative TrustPilot Reviewers "virgins."
Very good comparison
Very useful site
Very useful site for knowing what performance you get and info on many specific things, like paralax or splatter.
You can see what fps you'll get in games.
This site is very useful for comparing hardware. And many many things.
They are doing a wonderful job.
The Trustpilot Experience
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.